An argument against the use of animals for testing in the united states

The result is a complex picture: Between andlife expectancy in the United States increased from 47 to 77 years. There is so much more work to be done to give advocates the insight they need to choose the most effective ways to help animals.

The chart below provides the best estimates for the numbers of mice, rats, and birds used in the United States inas well as the other species whose use is covered by the Animal Welfare Act.

Fact Sheet: Cosmetic Testing

Not only does the act not cover these animals, it also does not mandate that researchers maintain any statistics for these species. This Faunalytics Fundamental has provided a visual overview of the use of animals in research.

Human health is more likely to be advanced by devoting resources to the development of non-animal test methods, which have the potential to be cheaper, faster, and more relevant to humans, instead of to chasing leads in often inaccurate tests on animals.

In nature, many primates, including rhesus macaques and baboons, stay for many years or their entire lives with their families and troops. This exclusive Faunalytics Fundamental examines the use of animals in research, estimating the scope and nature of the problem based on the best available data.

The above graphic shows a small selection of some of the most exciting and promising alternatives to animal research that exist today. What about trends over time?

First, animal advocates needs to educate themselves on the scienceand then communicate that effectively. These are questions advocates should think about and possibly research further.

We hope you find the information useful in your advocacy for research animals. There is no doubt that the animals we use for research and dissection are capable of thinking, feeling, and suffering just like we are.

Today, one can even become a board-certified surgeon without harming any animals.

Animal Testing Is Bad Science: Point/Counterpoint

On the contrary, there is a burgeoning field of alternatives to animal research, and many such alternatives are already in use today. Up to 1, drugs have shown effectiveness for neuroprotection in animals, but none for humans.

A review paper co-authored by a Yale School of Medicine professor in the prestigious medical journal The BMJ documented the overwhelming failure of experiments on animals to improve human health. We can now test skin irritation using reconstructed human tissues e. We hope you find the above information useful in your advocacy for animals used in research.

Through our Animal Tracker survey, Faunalytics has monitored attitudes about animals used for research since Pain relief is not provided. In the United States, a large percentage of the animals used in such testing (such as laboratory-bred rats and mice) are not counted in official statistics and receive no protection under the Animal Welfare Act.

Fundamentals: Research Animals

Are there other arguments against testing on animals? Yes. The vaccines we give our pets to protect them against rabies, parvo or leukemia would not exist without animal testing indeed more than 80 treatments that were initially researched for human use are now used in animals.

The vast majority of biologists and several of the largest biomedical and health organizations in the United States endorse animal testing.

A poll of 3, scientists by the Pew Research Center found that 89% favored the use of animals in scientific research. The following are common statements supporting animal experimentation followed by the arguments against them.

“Every major medical advance is attributable to experiments on animals.” This is simply not true. Oct 23,  · Do you know what animal testing is, what condition the animals live in, and what some alternatives to testing animals are?

Animal testing is the use of animals in biological, medical, and psychological studies. Human beings and many animals have similar organ systems and body processes. Fundamentals: Research Animals. For instance, a clear majority of people are against the use of animals for testing cosmetics and personal care products.

However, if the research is claimed to save or improve human lives, then opinions shift, even if those claims are hypothetical or baseless.

based in countries like the United States.

An argument against the use of animals for testing in the united states
Rated 5/5 based on 2 review