An argument against the use of animals in research

Where there are reliable alternatives in scientific research, animals are not used. It follows, therefore, that the function of animals is to serve the needs of human beings.

Animal Testing Is Bad Science: Point/Counterpoint

The attempt to grant all and only human beings a full and equal moral status does not work according to Singer. In summary, belief in the importance of research animal welfare has stayed strong, most people continue to question the adequacy of laws protecting laboratory animals, and belief in the necessity of animal research and dissection appears to be dropping in recent years.

We hope you find the above information useful in your advocacy for animals used in research. Furthermore, careful handling of the animals, and administration of appropriate anaesthetics and analgesics during the experiment, can help to reduce any pain experienced by the animals.

Because the AWA specifically excludes rats, mice, birds, and cold-blooded animals, more than 95 percent of the animals used in laboratories are not even covered by the minimal protection provided by federal laws.

However, when the interests of animals and human beings conflict we are required to give greater weight to the interests of human beings. A being that is a subject-of-a-life will: Another important factor is refining the experimental procedures themselves, and refining the management of pain.

The Case Against Animals Oxford: Therefore, we support a healthy and continued debate on the use of animals in research. Animals, from the fruit fly to the mouse, are widely used in scientific research. The first argument is The Argument from Marginal Cases; the second is an argument against the Kantian account of indirect duties to animals.

Since animals cannot direct their own actions, they are merely instruments and exist for the sake of the human beings that direct their actions.

Both Kant and Carruthers agree that my torturing my own cat for fun would be wrong. We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals Regan and Singer, Other approaches Other approaches to animal experiments One writer suggests that we can cut out a lot of philosophising about animal experiments by using this test: And another philosopher suggests that it would anyway be more effective to research on normal human beings: For example, on the above conception of rights, whether a being will have a right or not will depend on whether it is able to represent itself as a being that is legitimately pursuing the furtherance of its interests.

The prevalence of such operations throughout the country may be shocking to see. Since only human beings are capable of achieving this final end, all other beings exist for the sake of human beings and their achievement of this final end of the universe.

The chart below provides the best estimates for the numbers of mice, rats, and birds used in the United States inas well as the other species whose use is covered by the Animal Welfare Act.

He rejects robust views that claim that a being must be capable of representing itself as legitimately pursuing the furtherance of its interests on the grounds that this conception of rights implies that the marginal cases of humanity do not have rights.

Thus, we may not raise animals for food.

Arguments For Animal Research

Penicillin kills guinea pigs but is inactive in rabbits. Another way to escape this line of argument is to deny the second premise Cf. Given these considerations, Regan concludes that we must radically alter the ways in which we treat animals. Francis, Leslie Pickering and Richard Norman.

Indirect Theories On indirect theories, animals do not warrant our moral concern on their own, but may warrant concern only in so far as they are appropriately related to human beings.

We can now test skin irritation using reconstructed human tissues e. Only Human Beings are Rational, Autonomous, and Self-Conscious Some people argue that only rational, autonomous, and self-conscious beings deserve full and equal moral status; since only human beings are rational, autonomous, and self-conscious, it follows that only human beings deserve full and equal moral status.

Examples of positively valenced episodes of awareness are pleasure, joy, elation, and contentment. The Use of Animals in Medical Research, If those human subjects were normal and able to give free and informed consent to the experiment then this might not be morally objectionable.

Instead, each such being must be treated as an end in itself.

Animals and Ethics

The lack of ethical self-examination is common and generally involves the denial or avoidance of animal suffering, resulting in the dehumanization of researchers and the ethical degradation of their research subjects. Some people will say that that animals have not been as critical to medicine as is generally claimed.

Since they are similar to each other in these ways, we have good reason to believe that animals are conscious, just as are human beings. A review paper co-authored by a Yale School of Medicine professor in the prestigious medical journal The BMJ documented the overwhelming failure of experiments on animals to improve human health.

Aquinas believes that his view follows from the fact that God is the last end of the universe, and that it is only by using the human intellect that one can gain knowledge and understanding of God.

The FOI Act is retrospective so it applies to all information, regardless of when it was created. Notice that in order for this argument to succeed, it must target properties that admit of degrees. The scientific establishment has a lot of inertia in favor of continuing the use of animals in research, but is slowly shifting towards alternatives.An Ethical Argument Against Animal Experiments.

As animal advocates, we oppose animal experiments, on ethical grounds, believing that it is morally wrong to harm one species for the supposed benefit of another. Using animals in medical research. Print Reference this medical science’s most valuable tool in the fight against disease.’ Lastly, animal experimentation is justified due to the extensive biological similarities between the physiology of humans and non-human animals (Mepham, ).

brought forward the argument that ‘it is. The ethics of animal research. Talking Point on the use of animals in scientific research Only four complaints against scientific/medical research literature have been upheld, not because the science was flawed but as a result of either semantics or the ASA judging that the advertisement fell outside the UK remit.

The principles of. Arguments For Animal Research While it is important to provide a full explanation of the reasons why animal research and testing is important for modern medicine, it can sometimes be useful to have a handful of short pro animal research one-liners on hand.

Below you can find many of the arguments being made for and against the use of animals in the laboratory, some you are probably already aware of and some you may not have thought about what do you think? An Argument For Animal Research.

Length: words ( double-spaced pages) Rating: Excellent. but the use of animals in research for the benefit of all people is and always will be justifiable.

Essay about A Case Against Animal Testing.

An argument against the use of animals in research
Rated 4/5 based on 68 review